There is a new option to translate the Fujifilm film style metadata into a Lightroom camera profile setting. This will prevent Lightroom from automatically writing metadata edits back to the DNG and will force use of sidecars for metadata storage.
There is now an option to make the exported DNG file read only (or "locked"). Iridient Standard should be a closer match to Iridient Developer, however due to inherent differences in the camera profile formats (ICC versus Adobe DCP) the default color rendering will still not be identical. The complete release notes for X-Transformer is here, but I listed out the version 1.0 beta 4 changes below:Ī new Lightroom scripting plug-in is now available for sending images to Iridient X-Transformer for conversion which avoids some of the limitations and disadvantages of using Lightroom's external editing functionality (or "Edit In").Ī new option has been added to set the default DNG camera profile to either Iridient Standard or Adobe Standard. Since then Iridient has updated X-Transformer to 1.0 beta 4, so I gave it another spin. In my previous posts ( part1, part2, and part3) where I shared my search for an effective workflow for using the GFX with Capture One, I briefly touched on the usage of Iridient X-Transformer. It does not store any personal data.As a Capture One user, I am disappointed that it does not support the Fujifilm GFX 50S raw files. The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. I left the sharpening and noise reduction at the Adobe Lightroom defaults. I made adjustments to exposure, contrast, highlights, shadows, whites, blacks, vibrancy, and saturation. The featured image in this blog post is a FujiFilm X-T2 RAF post-processed in Adobe Lightroom. I don't recall anyone suggesting that I use a pair of binoculars or a magnifying glass so that I could better appreciate the work. I've visited many art and photography galleries in my lifetime.
#Best settings for iridient x transformer professional#
However, if you are a photographer, professional or amateur, for whom the technical bits of photography is not the main point, then I think you must do whatever produces the results you want, even if it's the SOOC JPEG. If you are a professional photographer, aka someone whose source of income is photography, who must produce the best technical image, the difference may be of concern to you.
that there's very little practical difference. I think that once an image has been post-processed, then downsized and compressed for the web - most photographs are being shared online via blogs, Instagram, Facebook, etc. Other photographers have taken a "zoom in until you find a difference" approach, testing the software, only to discover that the difference varies very subtlely between photographs and other factors help make the decision. I think it's mostly ignorance from some photographers. The buzz around the web is that Adobe Lightroom does a shitty job with the handling of RAW FujiFilm X-Trans files and that Iridient X-Transformer is the fix.
0 kommentar(er)
